‘Django Unchained’ actress defends not giving ID to cop

Whilst going through CNN’s Website I stumbled on a news story about an African American actress that was detained by a police officer for not giving him her ID. The title itself ‘Django Unchained’ actress defends not giving ID to cop did not particularly catch my attention after reading other more emotional and shocking headlines about War and beheadings, but what interested me were the legal rights involved and the outcome of the story.

cropped-1410794646000-danielle-watts-detain.jpg

As America always splurges with freedom and equal rights for everyone I was interested in reading the story as it talks about an African American woman who was held in handcuffs after refusing to give her ID to a cop, who got a citizen complaint that “a male white and female black were involved in a sexual act inside a Mercedes”. The nut graph also strengthened my curiosity so I kept on reading.

The story was in fact very well written as it breaks down exactly what happens after grabbing your attention with the first two paragraphs that contain strong language. The story is always backed up with reliable evidence and background information such as quotes from the victim, her boyfriend and the police officer that have been taken out of video footage also shown on the top of the page. The reporter also took the time to concentrate on both sides of the story, giving the LPAD the possibility to respond, which they did, and interviewing the victim once more.

When watching the video footage where the victim and the boyfriend were interviewed, it only confirmed me that the reporters did a good job in writing a fair story by going into detail and asking fair questions. The reporter looked into the legal rights, broke down exactly what happened by asking the right questions, showing audio recorded evidence and questioning both sides.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/09/14/showbiz/django-unchained-actress-detained/

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “‘Django Unchained’ actress defends not giving ID to cop

  1. Thanks for this. Wondering what you think of the interviewer adding her own views at one point, i.e. “male white and female black, I don’t like that language but it’s policespeak.” Was that called for or distracting?

    Like

    • Due to the fact that she was being pretty fair throughout the whole interview I do not believe that she had any bad intentions mentioning that its “policespeak”. It seemed more like she has had some experience herself concerning the language of policemen, and/or that policemen do tend to have the reputation of being a little racist in the USA.
      During the whole interview this seemed like the only little bias remark she made against policemen, but when looking at it as a whole her interview was very fair also questioning the victim a lot.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s